atnavobet (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

hehehehe that's a 52,000 tickets sold in texasalone..and you called arnel mimic...you just deduced that these 42,000 plus listeners like mimic singers..nothing original? last time i looked journey wih arnel had 11 new original songs and one or two is hitting the billboard chart hard! arnel has been with jurney less than a year!!

boyett5 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

pinaybeauty82... (Cont.) Also, my comment about the Anthropologists is .... I strongly believe that they value their ethics and will not consider any political agendas to do their job. And I believe that only those skeptics with political minds will try to taint the facts. Like what gptr002 said before, Facts are collections of all evidences from many sources and is not a work of only one person.

boyett5 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

pinaybeauty82 .. I think you said this before and it was answered by gptr002 on his previous post. And also I posted something about the Taiwan natives. I wonder if you have read the responses to your question. (cont.)

gptr002 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

omg....either you didn't read or you didn't undedrstand.The australian aboriginals, papua new guineans etc...are not austronesians. I don't know what they are, but they aren't Austtronesian.Austronesians are Asian descent. The average filipino is an entirely different race from the negrito...they just happen to live in the same land.Look more carefully :P all your questions are answered.

pinaybeauty82 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

gptr002 my theory is those white dudes who came up with this theory have a hidden agenda behind it.first is to condition our mind that what they called austronesian is not related to the mainland asia such as china, india, etc. For political reason.If you want to move people to your direction the best way to do it is to group them!once you group people it is easier to manipulate them! they want to create a new geo political movement behind those grouping!

pinaybeauty82 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

gptr002 the austronesian theory is just a theory!like what i said if you look at it closely there are more questions than answer.the aussie aborigen is closely related to a lot of tribe in papua new guinea, indonesia & im sure related to the aeta of the philippines! Why are they not included?

boyett5 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

gptr002.. My question is not answered. Dravidians? Never heard of that. New to me?

Greggorriosmyname (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

Why in the name of hell are you arguing about that??

gptr002 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

ive got no clue about the australian aboriginals...i heard they might be related to dravidians or something. they might be related to negritos as well. but they aren't related to filipinos as far as i know.

boyett5 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

gptr002.. Can I assume then that the aborigines came direct from Africa earlier in time?