GeorgeGaIIoway (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

no israel was not occupying lebanon until hezbollah attacked israeli cities with thousands of rockets.and there were only 3 lebanese prisoners in israel, not "thousands".

mohab1989 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

let forget abou galloway .... but ... wat the hell r u talking about ??!! israel is not occupying labnon ??!!! then wat the hell r they doing there ??!!!!

pink3highlighter (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

the ending was powerful, it really shows how ignorant people are to the palestinian side of the story...all people ever hear about is the israeli side. Its time people heard the other side.

HizbElKhabatha (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

You know if this was ANYONE else, I would respect them for saying this. But this guy is a complete and utter two-faced snake. Looking to gain support by ANY means possible. He talks about the Israeli army actions, as if he cares about human lives, while in reality that Saddam-loving prick has SO much in common with the IDF. Pfft. Like this subhuman cares about human lives. Even his PALESTINIAN wife could not stand him. Smite thy diabolical muppet! *rant over*

GeorgeGaIIoway (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

galloway is a LIAR.there were only 3 lebanese prisoners in israel, not "thousands" and israel isn't occupying lebanon.they also forgot to mention that hezbollah fired thousands of rockets on israeli cities

zincanodes (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

suggesting Fox took liberty with the facts. "Kind of like the Pot calling the Kettle Black", wouldn't you think? Personally I try to pay attention to as many news outlets as possible, weigh up what I have seen and then make a somewhat intetelligent opinion based on what was presented. To exclude one because of ideology or drink the "Bath Water" of one particular outlet is just silly! Do yourself a favour and view the O'Reilly/Obama interview. Very fair, I lots about Obama, interesting.

zincanodes (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

simoz: When being critical of any Print Media, cable news org. or mainstream network I would suggest that all be judged by the same criteria and objectivity. My opinion that is in the last U.S. election most org. had a bias.NSNBC/NBC - supported ObamaABC - HLR, then ObamaCNN - more or less balanced Interestingly enough H.R. Clinton felt that Fox News gave the most balanced coverage of the Primaries. Not my words hers. As to your comment about W.J. Clinton

simozonelayer (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

Thats a bit of a silly thing to say.Disagree with him for whatever reason you believe is right (accurate or not) but wishing him dead is both ignorant and juvenile at best.Not everyone is a terrorist although Sky, Fox and all the other biased/agenda driven 'news' makers may want you to believe otherwise.Do what open minded adults do; look at the facts, not propaganda, and make an informed decision.

simozonelayer (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

That's Sky and Fox for you.There's a great video where Clinton bites back against Fox's 'taking liberty' with the facts.

simozonelayer (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)

I don't know about the Zionist part but Rupert Murdoch's mother is Jewish which means his stance could be construed to be supportive of the Jewish position, regards world politics that is.Sky and Fox (Murdoch) do seem to lean in a specific direction and are often accused of being 'flexible' with the facts.