|
xravzx (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
omg that was awsomeBoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOm TiNgdat was awsomeInDiAnS rUlE bWaAaAaAaAaAaAaAp
SMmaja (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
elron?
iamELECTRO123 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Ahaha, Omg I love it :'D
dyfman31 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
o fuck off you racist lowlife
joeltherambo4 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
suleman mirza is the best,great,and awsome!!!!
DaHornyySquirrel (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
we got the same problems in Germany. Since almost 2 years not our most talented but the poorest with the most horrible story to tell win in our shows called "The super talent" or "Germany searches for the Superstar". Although I got sympathy for those people I don't think it makes sense to let them win just because they got it bad in life. Besides that, you do your decisions in life and if you lost, it's bad luck man.
rsd1196888 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
Unbelievable.... They are very good and they really deserved to win ....
cybercrow (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
both acts were fantastic and I would have been happy for George or Signature to win I think it was judged on talent not the state of their personal lives do we really live in such a FUCKED UP world that we cant be happy for a 14 year old lad that had the balls to go for his dream shame on you all who have said nasty things .signature showed dignity when they came second and appreciated that they had got so far some peps on here are just retarded
osmiley99 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
yeah george won because he was poor, what kind of show is this. y is it called britain got talent it should be called victory for the poorest in britain.
osmiley99 (December 31, 1969 at 4:59 pm)
no he cant, because he dances 2 fast when he immatates michael it looks retarded |
